fbpx

The UK wants to keep some asylum seekers in Rwanda


dsdsd

The UK government . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . will take some asylum seekers to Rwanda in Africa to process their applications. To this end, the United Kingdom is going to make an agreement with the country. British Prime Minister Boris Johnson will soon unveil a plan.  

Home Minister Preity Patel will then sign an immigration agreement with an African country.

The agreement would mean forcing unmarried / unmarried men to cross the English Channel into Rwanda.

The Migrant Council has criticized the policy, calling it “cruel”. The organization has called for a review.

Opposition parties have stated they will not run in the by-elections. The group added that the plan was to divert attention from Boris Johnson’s fines for violating the Kavid Act.

The Liberal Democrats say the proposal would be “costly for taxpayers.” However, it will not play a role in dangerously stopping channel crossings or fighting smuggling and trafficking rings. ‘

Under the deal, the Rwandan government is expected to receive an initial 120 million. Opponents, however, say the annual cost of the entire project will be much higher.  

See also  5 Tips To Reduce Accents Fast That Will Make All The Difference

Comments

comments

Scoopearth.com