If you’re bringing a malpractice claim in Maryland, you may find yourself torn between reaching a settlement or letting a trial verdict decide the outcome. Malpractice lawyers in Baltimore will be able to help you decide specifically what’s best for your case but read on for general information.
Table of Contents
Settlements
A settlement is a resolution between you and the defense where you agree to a compensation amount without the need for a trial. Opting for a settlement offers several benefits. Primarily, it provides a quicker resolution to your case, allowing you to receive compensation without the lengthy process of a trial. If you need immediate funds for medical expenses, rehabilitation, or to compensate for lost wages, this might be a good choice for you.
Additionally, settlements also afford a level of privacy that a trial does not. The details of your case, including any compensation you receive, typically remain confidential in a settlement. Financially, settlements can be more predictable than trial verdicts. You have the opportunity to negotiate the terms and know exactly how much compensation you will receive. This certainty can be a significant relief when facing the stress of a malpractice claim.
The Drawbacks of Settlements
It is crucial to take into account the possible drawbacks of reaching a settlement, and your attorney will assist you in comprehending how these could impact your individual case. Opting for a settlement might result in receiving a lower compensation amount than what you could potentially be granted in a favorable trial outcome, for instance. Additionally, when you settle, the defendant does not formally acknowledge wrongdoing, which can be unsatisfactory if seeking acknowledgment of malpractice is important to you.
The Trial Verdict
A trial verdict comes from a jury’s decision at the conclusion of a court case. Going to trial can result in a larger award than a settlement and provides a public forum for your case, which can validate your experience and suffering. A favorable verdict can bring a sense of justice and closure that a private settlement may not provide.
A trial also creates a public record, which can help to warn the community about a negligent practitioner or institution. This aspect of a trial can feel empowering, as it allows you to be a voice for change and can prevent others from experiencing similar malpractice.
Assessing the Risks of a Trial
Nevertheless, engaging in a trial poses significant risks. There is no assurance of a favorable outcome, and even if successful, the defendant may opt to appeal, leading to a protracted legal process lasting several years. Moreover, the expenses linked to proceeding to trial are usually higher than those associated with reaching a settlement, often requiring upfront and out-of-pocket payments.
Moreover, trials can be emotionally draining. The stress of reliving your experience during a trial, dealing with the uncertainty of the outcome, and facing potential public scrutiny can be overwhelming.
The Financial Implications of Your Decision
Your financial situation may significantly influence your decision. While a settlement provides a sure amount, a trial could result in more substantial compensation, but with the risk of receiving nothing if the verdict is not in your favor. It’s essential to evaluate your immediate financial needs against the potential long-term benefits of a trial.
The Need for Good Malpractice Lawyers in Baltimore
Bringing a malpractice claim in Maryland requires professional legal guidance from an experienced malpractice lawyer with knowledge of the local laws. They will help you understand the complexities of your case, including the likelihood of success at trial and the potential value of your claim. They can also manage negotiations with the defense to pursue a settlement that adequately compensates for your damages. Click here for more about how to find a qualified local professional.
The Impact on Your Life
Beyond the financial aspects, consider how each option affects your life. Settlements typically allow for a quicker return to normalcy, while trials can bring a protracted period of uncertainty and stress. The right choice will depend on your personal circumstances, your need for closure, and how you wish to move forward after the malpractice.
Evidence and Your Decision
A strong case with compelling evidence may encourage the defense to offer a fair settlement to avoid the uncertainty of a trial. However, if the evidence is less clear or if there are significant disputes over the facts, a trial may be necessary to fully present your side of the story. A good malpractice attorney will help you assess the evidence and determine the best course of action.
Length of the Legal Process
Time is another critical factor. Settlements can usually be reached relatively quickly, while trials may take years to conclude, especially if the case is appealed. This prolonged process can have implications for your recovery and well-being. The right legal strategy will balance the potential benefits of a trial against the certainty and speed of a settlement.
Consider your objectives for pursuing a malpractice claim, whether they involve seeking prompt compensation, obtaining public recognition of wrongdoing, or a combination of factors. The guidance of your attorney, with their expertise, will play a crucial role in navigating and making informed decisions throughout this process.
